Page 1 of 1
El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:59 am
by gurf
Well hello guys. I'm planning to buy this beautie.
it's about 800-900$ when you exchange from my currency (ca 1zl = 3$).
I think it's el degas cause of headstock and tuners, how do you think? The owner says it sounds great without amp, and I'm going to check it on monday or tuesday, then sell all my equipment and buy this. Detailed pics will be provided when It'll be mine

Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:41 am
by Barry
Charles is the expert on these things, but it sure is pretty!
Welcome here and don't forget those pix when you get her!
Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:50 pm
by charles
That's a high price for a copy in my opinion, considering real 70s Rics tend to be around the 1500USD range (at least last time I checked). I get a bit cheesed off when people put Ric plates on copies, but at least you know that it's a copy you are buying into.
Those tuners look consistent with my El Degas, so whether or not it ever carried an "El Degas" label, it's possibly from the same manufacturer.
Good news is that it's probably a very nice bass, if it's been as well cared for as it looks; and is a real neckthrough construction. Do be aware however, that the Ric copies I've come across do NOT have the dual action truss rods that real Rics have. You may need to use lighter gauge strings as a result. Caveat emptor.
Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:14 pm
by gurf
Well it may be a high price in USA, but in Poland its quite ok. I'd say its mid hi range. And real 70s ricks now cos about 2-2,5k. Not to mention additional expenses like toaster and/or checker. About the TRC: someone made it actually by ... hand. I'll leave it as a memorial.
And the good news is true. It sounds amazing. I didnt even thought that it may sound like that. It had fingerboard glued, and there is a minor crack on the shedua strip line between bridge and mid pickup position. Its very shallow. Overall - as even some rics - its a bit too bassy with everything on full, so im playing sth like 80% neck and 100% bridge. I'm not complaining so far. Previously played on a squier pbass from japan (1983) and ric is way more comfortable.

compared to 2008 real ric i think this one suits my style and sound preferences better.
Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:25 pm
by charles
Enjoy it!
My Ric copy is a bit "flubby" on the neck pickup as well, but these basses do a good job of recreating the signature Ric sound (in my opinion).
Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:14 pm
by gurf
I will record tommorow some sound samples after finally plugging this baby to a normal amp

so i'll provide them if theres nothing against

Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:19 pm
by charles
Please do! I look forward to hearing them.

Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:21 pm
by gurf
So they will be recorded and posted.

Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 1:14 pm
by gurf
Crap. I was under the impression of 'omg! it's new bass etc.' and reconsidered and got back to my old pbass. Got some recordings though, so I'll post them. It had this 0047 mfd thing in the wiring. I didnt have the solder to take it out. Anyway:
http://www.voila.pl/102/xy8v3/?1
that's this crappy recording
Anyway it broke after i gave it back. Wasn't my fault though. Whew.
I'm buying now 34 y.o. ibanez bolt on copy with ric seymour duncans (!) for ehehe. 400$ :}. I know - it's not el degas, but I'll record sth too (I just have to buy amp) as a comparision.
About the recording - it's plugged into ampeg b100r (veeeeeery vintage-like amp, and it's very muddy).
Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 1:38 pm
by charles
Thanks for sharing

Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 2:24 pm
by gurf
and what do you think about those recordings? they're really flat, arent they?
Re: El Degas RIC 70s
Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 4:49 pm
by charles
gurf wrote:and what do you think about those recordings? they're really flat, arent they?
fine for a demo.
Could use some EQing to make it 'pop', but served its purpose just fine.